Sorry, the offer is not available,
but you can perform a new search or explore similar offers:

It Assistant – Kenya Primary Literacy Programme

Job Description Project Description  The Kenya Primary Literacy Programme (KPLP) is a five-year initiative that supports the Kenyan Ministry of Education to ...


From Education Development Center - Nairobi Area

Published a month ago

Deputy Registrar At Jomo Kenyatta University Of Agriculture Technology

REF: JKU/ADM/DR/04/2024Applicants must possess:PhD in Management related field andThree (3) years' experience in grade 13 or equivalentORMaster's degree in e...


From Ta University Of Agriculture Technology - Nairobi Area

Published a month ago

Curriculum Designer (Online Learning) At Africa Digital Media Institute (Admi)

The RoleThe Curriculum Designer creates, consolidates, and disseminates educational content and materials that align with the organization's learning objecti...


From Africa Digital Media Institute (Admi) - Nairobi Area

Published a month ago

Political Assistant With Substitution - Usefms Only At U.S. Embassy To Kenya

DutiesThe Political Associate is responsible for a broad range of analytical reporting, information gathering, and advocacy on host country political issues....


From U.S. Embassy To Kenya - Nairobi Area

Published a month ago

Request For Application Girls' Learning Through Technology

Request For Application Girls' Learning Through Technology
Company:

Irex


Details of the offer

Description REQUEST FOR APPLICATION For IREXIssuance Date:October 5th, 2022Closing Date:October 21st, 2022Closing Time: 5:00pm EATSubject:Request for Application (RFA) Number 01Girls Learning Through Technology (GLTT)Reference:Issued Under an International Research and Exchange Board (IREX) This Request for Applicationoutlines the information required by the applicant for the development and submission of a proposal for consideration. The potential applicant is expected to review, understand, and conform with specifications contained in this RFA. Failure to do so will be at the applicant's own risk. All reasonable, allocable, and allowable expenses, both direct and indirect, which are related to the sub-grant program and are in accordance with applicable cost standards may be charged under the sub-grant. This RFA is being issued and consists of this cover letter and Schedule A.Issuance of this RFA does not constitute an award commitment on the part of GLTT/IREX nor does it commit GLTT/ IREX to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of an application. The application is submitted at the risk of the applicant. All preparation and submission costs are at the applicant's expense.Thank you for your interest in GLTT and IREX activities.Sincerely,Alexis FieldProgram Officer GLTT/IREXSCHEDULE AGLOSSARY OF TERMSIREX – InternationalResearch and ExchangeBoardGLTT – Girls Learning Through TechnologyCBC – Competency-Based CurriculumTOT – Training of TrainersTPD – Teacher Professional DevelopmentSTEM – Science, Technology Engineering & MathematicsCSO – Curriculum Support OfficerUSD – US DollarsLTPT – Learning Through Play and TechnologyRFA – Request for ApplicationSECTION I: FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION:a.The GLTT project is funded by The Stone Family Foundation and implemented by IREX in Kilifi County. GLTT uses a technology-based approach to support girls' education and development of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) skills in low-tech schools through evidence-based practices and research. The project is working to develop digital literacy capacity of teachers and their abilityto use creative coding usingScratch and MakeyMakey in tech labs to deliver CBC and apply gender responsivenessto engage girls in ICT.IREX invites interested local organizations to submit an application to partner withIREX in implementing GLTTby providing supportduring Tech Training of Trainers (ToTs), Teacher Professional Development (TPDs), Tech and Gender inclusive Coaching Sessions and development oftech lab activities. Please see program description and Scope of Work description in Section IV.b.Program Purpose: The end goal for GLTT is to increase girls' attendance, improve the quality of their learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects, and develop digital literacy skills.c.SECTION II: AWARD INFORMATION:The expected duration of IREX's support or the period of performance isNovember1, 2022 – March31, 2023. IREX expects to award one subaward in the amount of $15,000-$20,000USD.GLTT/IREX reserves the right to fund any or none of the applications submitted.SECTION III: ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION:The applicant / application must meet the following requirementsBe officially registered and working in compliance with all applicable civil and fiscal regulations, including, but not limited to pertinent local laws and status.Be officially registered as a legal entity and working in compliance with all applicable local laws.Ability to implement the program activities as detailed in Section IV Program Description and Scope of Work in order to meet the projects objectives and principlesContain expected outcomes and results consistent with and linked to the project's objectivesApplicant is not a debarred organizationTypes of Sub-Awardees Eligible:Non-US Nongovernment Organizations (Non-US NGOs)Community Based Organization (CBOs)Civil Society Organizations (CSOs)Professional AssociationsUniversitiesCost share is not required.Section IV. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF WORK A.Program Description and PurposeProject objectives: The aim of the GLTT project is to develop the capacity of teachers in low-tech schools to use technology to deliver the CBC and to apply gender-responsive and practical labs to engage girls in ICT. The overarching goal is to create high-tech schools in which teachers have the confidence and capacity to use ICT regularly in their teaching and female students have improved learning outcomes in STEM subjects and increased digital literacy skills. The outcomes of the GLTT project and corresponding research will deepen stakeholders' (., government institutions, implementing organizations, donors, teachers, and researchers) knowledge on effective ways to mainstream ICT into the curriculum and improve girls' learning outcomes in STEM subjects. The GLTT project will build on IREX's KPLAY project, making it both cost-effective and scalable, as the findings from GLTT are fed back into the KPLAY's programming and plans for scale-up. Target population: The GLTT will be implemented with Grade 4 teachers and girls across 15 randomly selected public primary schools within Kilifi County, a coastal tourist destination. Kilifi is one of the most marginalized counties with the highest girls' dropout rates in the country and lowest levels of access to ICT.Project Outcomes: The goal of GLTT will be to equip 2,400 girls in marginalized areas with math, computer literacy and design thinking skills. These foundational STEM skills are assessed in Kenyan national exams. Girls will also develop soft skills in the CBC, such as creative thinking and collaboration skills through teamwork and problem-solving. Overall, 60 Grade 4 teachers (roughly four per school) will have increased knowledge and skills to integrate ICT into classroom subjects while incorporating existing technology and local resources. Key Components and Activities:The project activities will be implemented through three key components: 1) equipping low-tech schools with ICT resources, including updated ICT devices and improved facilities to successfully integrate technology into classroom lessons; 2) gender-responsive teacher training and professional development for improved ICT integration into the curriculum; and 3) development of Tech Labs to facilitate hands-on use of ICT hardware and software, expression of creativity, and collaborative learning. Research OutlineTo support learning and dissemination of project outcomes, IREX will conduct an evaluation to measure the impact of GLTT on girls' learning of core STEM subjects and their acquisition of digital literacy skills. The following three learning questions will be explored to assess the assumption that equipping teachers in low-tech schools with ICT resources, gender responsive LTPT training and professional development, and ICT Tech labs will increase teachers' confidence and ability to use technology regularly in the classroom and enhance girls' digital skills and learning outcomes: 1. To what extent do teachers in low-tech schools trained in LTPT methodology use technology more regularly for classroom instruction? 2. Do girls attending low-tech schools with teachers trained in the LTPT methodology and gender-responsive pedagogy use technology more frequently and consistently and have higher digital literacy skills than girls in low-tech schools with untrained teachers? 3. Does supporting teachers in low-tech schools to use LTPT methodology and gender-responsive pedagogy improve learning outcomes for girls in STEM subjects (., Science or Math)? Through a quasi-experimental research study, a sample of low-tech schools receiving the intervention (treatment group) will be compared with a sample of low-tech schools in Kilifi County who did not receive any intervention (control group). The sample will be selected randomly and stratified to ensure a representative proportion of female teachers. However, current data from KPLAY staff suggests that 80% of teachers are female. Data will be collected at baseline and endline to identify gains in learning and usage of ICT by the end of the 18-month intervention. Monitoring data will also be collected throughout implementation to track progress against indicators and will inform the end-of-project results. Our proposed methodology to respond to the first learning question will include classroom observation and key informant interviews with target teachers, coaches, and school heads in treatment schools only. To understand the resources and ICT practices in control schools, we will rely on interviews with CSOs who conduct regular monitoring visits. Through these data collection methods, we will explore which subjects' technology was used most often, how frequently and for what purposes to assess whether usage is aligned with the LTPT training methodology, and to capture any possible innovations occurring in the classroom. For the second learning question, evidence will be collected through both ongoing programmatic monitoring efforts in addition to the impact evaluation. The first part of the question, "do girls use technology more frequently and consistently?", will be collected through classroom observations in treatment schools, and interviews with female students, teachers, school principals, and coaches in both treatment and control groups at the baseline, during monitoring visits, and at the end of the intervention. The second half of the question, "do girls have higher digital literacy skills?" will be assessed through a basic computer literacy skills test administered at baseline and endline. This test will be aligned with the CBC to determine if girls are achieving expected digital literacy competencies. Qualitative data on how girls are using technology in ICT Play Labs, in the school and community, including case studies of projects girls have completed, will provide additional insights into the extent to which girls' capacity to use ICT has increased as a result of GLTT and/or whether girls have exceeded expected outcomes. For the third learning question, we intend to explore the impacts stemming from training teachers in low-tech schools in ICT, LTPT and gender-responsive strategies on girls' learning outcomes, pending timing of and access to available government assessments. The primary source of data to provide evidence for this question will be national student assessments conducted annually in Grade 4. Specifically, the project will use performance data from national exams on STEM subjects (science and math subjects) since the project is supporting the implementation of the CBCs. However, this will depend on when the project is implemented and when the national exams take place. Additional supporting data will include learning portfolios and continuous assessment. Scope of workThe scope of workprovides information on activities to be completed by the sub-awardee, in partnership with the GLTT team, related to the areas of research, ToTs, TPDs. Coaching Sessions and development of Tech labs. The scope of work covers the implementation of activities between November 2022 to March 2023.Good faith efforts will be made to revise, adapt, and adjust the scope of work, deliverables, budgets, and timelines as appropriate.B. Terms of Reference- Detailed Tasks:In collaboration with IREX's GLTT team, the sub-awardee tasks include the following:Review and contextualize the availabletechnology and gender responsive training content and ensure its relevant and applicable for the intended capacity building of Curriculum Support officers and Grade 4 teachers.Provide technical support during TOTs of CSOs and TPD workshops ofGrade 4 teachers.Support in designingcoaching modelsand conductcontinuous CSO coaching sessionsto ensure content mastery andCSOs canconceptualize, contextualize the curriculum and can be able to support grade 4 teachersintegrate LTPT in the classroomsCarry out school visits to the different TechLabs to assess use and ICT integration in the classroom.Attend the scheduled research team calls and the STEM Research Committee meetings Assist the MEL & Research team in the creation of school assessment tools, ICT skills and competencies.Support the data collection during midline and endline surveySection V: APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION:a.Application OverviewAny questions concerning this RFA should be submitted in writingno later than five days prior to the closing date shown aboveto Alexis Field, Program Officer, GLTT,. Applicants should retain for their records one copy of all enclosures which accompany their application.The application must be received at the Kilifi/IREX's office at the email below no later than the closing date listed on the front page of this RFA. Pre-award costs are not allowable and will not be reimbursed. An application and modifications thereof shall be submitted in electronic format to Provide example of experience related to virtual trainingProvide example of experience facilitating programs for boys and girls, in mixed or separated group settingsRequired AttachmentsCopy of Local RegistrationCopy of Sample time sheetInternal Procurement Policies (if applicable)Most Recent Audit (if applicable)b. Restrictions: Sub-award funds provided under the terms of this RFA shall not be used to:Procure goods or services from suppliers that may be identified on the USG consolidated list of debarred, suspended or ineligible contractors at http://www.SAM.gov/.Make any purchases or fund activities deemed unnecessary to successfully complete the activity, including any sub-awardee headquarters' expenses that are not directly linked to the implementation of the proposed project.Pay previous obligations and/or bad debts.Pay fines and /or penalties.C.Late Application Late applications are marked as "late" and are ineligible for review or award; however, IREX reserves the right to accept and include late applications in the review and award process when it is considered within the best interest of IREX to do so and if applications that were received on time have not been opened and reviewed. Applications that are submitted late or incomplete run the risk of not being considered for review.SECTION V: APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION:Within ten working days of the deadline for submitting applications, a technical review committee will convene. Throughout the evaluation process, IREX shall take steps to ensure that members of the committee do not have any conflicts of interest or the appearance of such regarding the organizations whose applications are under review. An individual shall be considered to have the appearance of a conflict of interest "if that person, or that person's spouse, partner, child, close friend, or relative works for or is negotiating to work for or has a financial interest (including being an unpaid member of a Board of Directors) in any organization that submitted an application currently under the panel's review." Members of the committee shall neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from parties to the awards. Note: Under unusual circumstances the technical review committee may be delayed.Verification of the application submission requirements will be conducted by the IREX field grants manager. Awards will be made within ten working days after the technical evaluation committeecompletes its review. The application will be evaluated according to the evaluation criteria set outbelow. To the extent necessary (if an award is not made based on initial applications), negotiations may be conducted with each applicant whose application, after discussion and negotiation, has a reasonable chance of being selected for the award. b.Evaluation criteriaa. Technical Merit 15 points?Relevance to program goals ?Sustainability of project results ?Technical proposal for recruiting facilitators and leading trainings?Technical proposal for working with schools?Technical Proposal for engaging partners and local communities in ICT and/or LTPT Topics?Technical experience with ICT with primary school children.?Experience conducting program analysis and monitoring?Anticipated impact on the beneficiariesb.Past Performance / Organizational Capacity 25 points?Past performance in similar projects ?Relevant staff skills and structure to implement the proposed project?Experience in geographical region ?Experience in building relationships with public schools?Experience facilitating teachers?Experience with virtual trainings?Written accounting and procurement procedures?Capacity to communicate with IREX DC and Kenya based IREX consultant?Capacity to securely receive and disperse funds to project stakeholders in compliance with program objectives?Capacity to communicate virtually with Mombasaand DC based IREX staff and consultants, and potential stakeholders across Kenyac.Feasibility and Cost Effectiveness 10 points?Are costs reasonable, allowable, and allocable ?Is the proposal cost effectiveSection VI: AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION INFORMATIONOverview: The recommendation or selection of an application in accordance with established procedures does not guarantee an award. All applicants must demonstrate that they possess, or can obtain, the necessary management competence to practice mutually agreed upon methods of accountability for funds and other assets provided. A successful applicant can expect to receive an Award Letter, signed by the program. The award letter will be addressed to the organization's point of contact as stated in the application. Following the Award Letter, final negotiations will take place before the signing of a sub-grant agreement.Reporting Procedures:A description of reporting requirements will be included in the Sub-Grant Agreement. The types of reporting required, along with the schedule of reporting, will depend on the sub-grant type and project duration. Reporting forms will be provided to sub-grant recipients. Types of reporting will include the following:Program report to be submitted during project implementation according to a schedule described in the sub-grant agreement. This report will include a description of progress made during the period, problems in project implementation; actions taken to overcome them; and activities planned for the next period. The final program report will describe how the project objectives and goals were reached, results of the project, and problems and solutions during implementation. Financial reports will be submitted according to a schedule described in the sub-grant agreements. Types of financial reports, as well as the schedule of reporting, will depend on the type of sub-grant, length of the project, and amount of funding. In addition, the sub-grantee is required to submit a detailed Final Financial Report. Issuance of the final installment of sub-award funds is contingent upon GLTT receipt and acceptance of Final Financial and Final Program Reports.SECTION VII - OTHER INFORMATION The issuance of this RFA does not constitute an award or commitment on the part of IREX, nor does it commit GLTT/ IREX to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of an application. IREXreserves the right to fund any or none of the applications submitted. Further, IREX reserves the right to make no awards as a result of this RFA. For examples of Safeguarding Best Practices see: and


Source: Talent_Ppc

Job Function:

Requirements

Request For Application Girls' Learning Through Technology
Company:

Irex


Built at: 2024-05-12T06:07:07.153Z